Methods of data collection in qualitative research interviews and focus groups pdf

Posted on Tuesday, April 27, 2021 7:16:58 AM Posted by Sagar M. - 27.04.2021 and pdf, and pdf 5 Comments

methods of data collection in qualitative research interviews and focus groups pdf

File Name: methods of data collection in qualitative research interviews and focus groups .zip

Size: 1574Kb

Published: 27.04.2021

How can qualitative researchers collect data during social-distancing measures?

A focus group is a group interview involving a small number of demographically similar people. Their reactions to specific researcher-posed questions are studied. Focus groups are used in market research and studies of people's political views. The discussions can be guided or open. They can concern a new product or something else.

Methods of data collection in qualitative research: interviews and focus groups

Already have an account? Log in. Sign up. If you need more help, please contact our support team. Today businesses and organizations are connected to their clients, customers, users, employees, vendors, and sometimes even their competitors. Data can tell a story about any of these relationships, and with this information, organizations can improve almost any aspect of their operations. Although data can be valuable, too much information is unwieldy, and the wrong data is useless. Luckily, organizations have several tools at their disposal for primary data collection.

The methods range from traditional and simple, such as a face-to-face interview, to more sophisticated ways to collect and analyze data. Some of the methods covered here are quantitative, dealing with something that can be counted. Others are qualitative, meaning that they consider factors other than numerical values. In general, questionnaires, surveys, and documents and records are quantitative, while interviews, focus groups, observations, and oral histories are qualitative.

There can also be crossover between the two methods. With JotForm, you can successfully utilize several of these methods, especially by using ready to use questionnaires and survey templates! Data analysis can take various formats. The method you choose depends on the subject matter of your research. This is where qualitative data collection methods come into play.

Qualitative data collection looks at several factors to provide a depth of understanding to raw data. While qualitative methods involve the collection, analysis, and management of data, instead of counting responses or recording numeric data, this method aims to assess factors like the thoughts and feelings of research participants. There are three commonly used qualitative data collection methods: ethnographic, theory grounded, and phenomenological.

Through this method, researchers veer away from the specific and practical questions that traditional market researchers use and instead observe the participants in a nondirected way. Ethnography helps fill in the blanks when a participant may not be able to articulate their desires or the reasons for their decisions or behaviors. Instead of, or in addition to, asking why a participant acts a certain way, researchers use observation to understand the why behind these desires, decisions, or behaviors.

Before this method, qualitative data analysis was actually done before any quantitative data was collected, so it was disconnected from the collection and analysis process. An example of phenomenology is studying the experiences of individuals involved in a natural disaster. To analyze data from such an event, the researcher must become familiar with the data; focus the analysis on the subject matter, time period, or other factors; and categorize the data. Completing these tasks gives the researcher a framework for understanding how the natural disaster impacts people.

Together, the understanding, focus, and organization help researchers identify patterns, make connections, interpret data, and explain findings. Each of these qualitative data collection methods sheds light on factors that can be hidden in simple data analysis. Qualitative data is one way to add context and reality to raw numbers. Often, researchers find value in a hybrid approach, where qualitative data collection methods are used alongside quantitative ones.

Marketers, scientists, academics, and others may start a study with a predetermined hypothesis, but their research often begins with the collection of data. Initially, the collected data is unstructured.

Various facts and figures may or may not have context. Quantitative analysis relates to evaluating a numerical result. A classic example is a survey, which asks questions to collect responses that shed light on trends, preferences, actions, opinions, and any other element that can be counted. Quantitative data collection methods are popular because they are relatively straightforward. Using these methods, researchers ask questions to collect sets of facts and figures.

Quantitative data is measurable and expressed in numerical form. While this seems like a fairly simple concept, like many aspects of research, there are various approaches to quantitative data collection that depend on the particular research being conducted.

Often, the researcher begins without a hypothesis and lets the data steer the direction of the study. A simple example of quantitative descriptive research is a study that collects and tabulates test scores. Descriptive research frequently uses charts and tables to illustrate results. While a descriptive approach is often quantitative, it can be qualitative.

A positive correlation is one in which two variables either increase or decrease at the same time. A negative correlation is when an increase in one variable means a decrease in another. There is also a zero correlation result, in which the relationship between two variables is insignificant.

Correlation helps make predictions based on historical relationships and in determining the validity and reliability of a study. This is a positive correlation. Using the experimental method, researchers randomly assign participants in an experiment to either the control or treatment groups. In both of these types of studies, independent variables are manipulated. Experimental methods are known for producing results that are both internally and externally valid, meaning that the study is conducted, or structured, well internal validity and the findings are applicable to the real world external validity.

Quasi-experimental methods, on the other hand, produce results of questionable internal validity. There are a number of ways researchers can put different types of quantitative data collection into action without using experiments.

Quantitative surveys enable researchers to ask closed-ended questions with a provided list of possible answers. This method is easier for respondents, as they just pick from a list of responses. Because the questions and answers are standardized, researchers can use the results to make generalizations. Closed-ended questions, however, can be limiting. A respondent may not see their answer in the given choices. Quantitative interviews are typically conducted face to face, over the phone, or via the internet.

They enable researchers to not only collect information but also tailor the questions to the audience on the spot. Since most research involves the collection of data, there are several methods for direct, or primary, data collection, including surveys, questionnaires, direct observations, and focus groups. While primary data collection is considered the most authoritative and authentic data collection method, there are several instances where secondary data collection methods can provide value.

What is secondary data collection, and why would a researcher employ it in addition to primary data? Second-hand data can add insight to a research project, and using secondary data is more efficient and less expensive than collecting primary data.

Answering this question involves understanding how a lot of research is initiated today. For a variety of reasons, lots of governmental entities and agencies collect demographic and other information on people. Governments collect data through various means, sometimes as part of other activities. The census is a primary example of valuable governmental primary data collection that can be used as a secondary data collection method in other research studies. Several nonprofit and governmental entities specialize in collecting data to feed the efforts of other researchers.

Commercial sources include research and trade associations, such as banks, publicly traded corporations, and others. Educational institutions are also reliable sources of secondary data. Many colleges and universities have dedicated research arms that leverage data for educational purposes. This data can often assist others in unrelated studies. There is more to secondary data than the fact that it is cheaper than primary data; however, cost is a major reason why this data is used.

Sometimes primary data is unnecessary for a particular research goal. You should first determine whether or not your research questions have already been asked and answered. If so, you can devote your data collection budget to expand on what has already been determined through other unrelated projects.

The cost of collecting primary data can be considerable. While using secondary data is cheaper, it also saves time. Time has a value of its own in research, allowing for greater emphasis on studying results. Ultimately, using secondary data saves time and money, which facilitates a more in-depth study of the subject. Combined with primary research, secondary data can help researchers better understand their subjects and more efficiently prepare and organize results. If you asked someone completely unaware of data analysis how to best collect information from people, the most common answer would likely be interviews.

Almost anyone can come up with a list of questions, but the key to efficient interviews is knowing what to ask. Efficiency in interviewing is crucial because, of all the primary data collection methods, in-person interviewing can be the most expensive.

There are ways to limit the cost of interviews, such as conducting them over the phone or through a web chat interface. But sometimes an in-person interview can be worth the cost, as the interviewer can tailor follow-up questions based on responses in a real-time exchange. Interviews also allow for open-ended questions. Compared to other primary data collection methods, such as surveys, interviews are more customizable and responsive.

Observation involves collecting information without asking questions. This method is more subjective, as it requires the researcher, or observer, to add their judgment to the data. But in some circumstances, the risk of bias is minimal. For example, if a study involves the number of people in a restaurant at a given time, unless the observer counts incorrectly, the data should be reasonably reliable.

Variables that require the observer to make distinctions, such as how many millennials visit a restaurant in a given period, can introduce potential problems. In general, observation can determine the dynamics of a situation, which generally cannot be measured through other data collection techniques.

Observation also can be combined with additional information, such as video. Sometimes you can collect a considerable amount of data without asking anyone anything. Document- and records-based research uses existing data for a study.

Data Collection Methods

Home Consumer Insights Market Research. Qualitative research is a type of study carried out with a qualitative approach to understand the exploratory reasons and to assay how and why a specific program or phenomenon operates in the way it is working. Qualitative data collection methods serve the primary purpose of collecting textual data for research and analysis. The collected research data is used to examine. The qualitative data is textual or non-numerical. It covers mostly the images, videos, texts, and written or spoken words by the people. You can opt for any digital data collection methods , like structured or semi-structured surveys, or settle for the traditional approach comprising individual interviews, group discussions, etc.


The most popular methods of data collection in qualitative research are the interview, focus groups and observation. Interviews are conducted individually, which.


Qualitative research method-interviewing and observation

Already have an account? Log in. Sign up. If you need more help, please contact our support team. Today businesses and organizations are connected to their clients, customers, users, employees, vendors, and sometimes even their competitors.

Special limitations to anonymity, confidentiality and ability to remove or withdraw data

To browse Academia. Skip to main content. By using our site, you agree to our collection of information through the use of cookies. To learn more, view our Privacy Policy. Log In Sign Up. Download Free PDF.

Focus groups have received little attention from sociologists, although they are a commonly used qualitative technique in market research. The data collected in focus group sessions typically consist of tape-recorded group discussions among four to ten participants who share their thoughts and experiences on a set of topics selected by the researcher. We present a brief description of dimensions along which focus groups vary in their format and relate these dimensions to an example from our own focus groups, where the topic is how people think about the causes and prevention of heart attacks.

COMMENT 5

  • Nespresso vertuoline manual pdf english mou signed by india with other countries in 2017 pdf Andrew P. - 28.04.2021 at 14:29
  • Molecular biology weaver 5th edition pdf keyboard notes for old hindi songs pdf Spircaupumen - 28.04.2021 at 22:14
  • PDF | This paper explores the most common methods of data collection used in qualitative research: interviews and focus groups. The paper. Lucas M. - 30.04.2021 at 10:11
  • Qualitative research methodology is considered to be suitable when the researcher or the investigator either investigates new field of study or intends to ascertain and theorize prominent issues. Victoria T. - 02.05.2021 at 12:22
  • Metrics details. Gentsisouroll1950 - 06.05.2021 at 17:41

LEAVE A COMMENT