Why religion is nature and science is not pdf
File Name: why religion is nature and science is not .zip
- Impact of Science on Religion
- Religion and Science
- Religion has nothing to do with science – and vice versa
Impact of Science on Religion
Richard B. Norgaard is professor of energy and resources and of agricultural and resource economics at the University of California at Berkeley. We care because the broad events that had to happen, happened to happen in a certain particular way. Something almost unspeakably holy—I don't know how else to say this—underlies our discovery and confirmation of the actual details that made our world and also, in realms of contingency, assured the minutiae of its construction in the manner we know, and not in any one of a trillion other ways, nearly all of which would not have included the evolution of a scribe to record the beauty, the cruelty, the fascination, and the mystery. Many scientists privately hold religious beliefs. Others have had transformative spiritual experiences that lead them beyond science. Many theologians wrestle with how God's creation is both being transformed by and is coevolving with science and technology.
Religion and Science
Some scientists assert that valid knowledge can only come from science. They hold that religious beliefs are the remains of pre-scientific explanations of the world and amount to nothing more than superstition. On the other side, some people of faith believe that science conveys a materialistic view of the world that denies the existence of any reality outside the material world. Science, they think, is incompatible with their religious faith. I contend that both — scientists denying religion and believers rejecting science — are wrong. Science and religious beliefs need not be in contradiction.
Religion has nothing to do with science – and vice versa
It is widely acknowledged that the new emerging discipline cognitive science of religion has a bearing on how to think about the epistemic status of religious beliefs. Both defenders and opponents of the rationality of religious belief have used cognitive theories of religion to argue for their point. This paper will look at the defender-side of the debate. I will discuss an often used argument in favor of the trustworthiness of religious beliefs, stating that cognitive science of religion shows that religious beliefs are natural and natural beliefs ought to be trusted in the absence of counterevidence.
The relationship between religion and science is the subject of continued debate in philosophy and theology. To what extent are religion and science compatible? Are religious beliefs sometimes conducive to science, or do they inevitably pose obstacles to scientific inquiry? It studies historical and contemporary interactions between these fields, and provides philosophical analyses of how they interrelate. This entry provides an overview of the topics and discussions in science and religion.